HETEROSEXUAL AGGRESSORS VS. MINORS: MARRIAGE; EXTRAMARITAL AND POSTMARKAL COITUS
Author: admin
A little over half of our sample of aggressors vs. minors had married prior to being interviewed, not a small proportion considering that they are our youngest group of offenders. The average aggressor vs. minors married earlier than the average member of any other group—to be specific, at age 20.5 years.
Of all our groups, they had the most unstable marriages. They are the only group in which fewer than half of the ever-married men had married only once. Evidently only their youthfulness and the consequent limitation of time had prevented them from making a record for even larger numbers of marriages. Naturally, they are notable not only for multiple marriages but for the brevity of their marriages. They rank first among those with one broken marriage of two years or less, and fourth with two or more equally brief marriages.
In the light of all this, it comes as no surprise to find that the aggressor vs. minors had by far the shortest acquaintance with his future wife—in fact, he had known her for less than two months. This short acquaintance was no handicap to him in having premarital coitus with her: 86 per cent did, the largest proportion of any group. The relatively short time between the beginning of coitus and marriage prevented any large number of pregnant brides. It is worth noting that despite the brevity of his marriages the aggressor vs. minors had a moderate number of children (18 for every ten aggressors vs. minors).
Once married, the aggressors vs. minors were inclined toward lengthy precoital play. Over one third (second only to the aggressors vs. adults) habitually devoted half an hour or more to petting prior to marital coitus. For the majority, this included mouth-genital contact —indeed, 43 per cent (second in rank-order) experienced both fellation and cunnilingus. The unusual interest in mouth-genital contact typical of aggressors vs. minors and adults exhibited before marriage carried over into marriage.
Since a high incidence of mouth-genital contact in marriage usually is indicative of liberal sexual attitudes, it follows that a very large proportion of the aggressors vs. minors used coital positions other than the conventional male-prone female-supine. Also a moderately high number (17 per cent) had had anal coitus with their wives.
We cannot determine whether the high incidence of premarital coitus with fianc?es and the hasty marriages indicate that the aggressors vs. minors were marrying females who were above average in sexual responsiveness. We can, however, state that on the basis of their husbands’ reports these wives were second only to the wives of the peepers in orgasmic responsiveness; in over three quarters of the years of marriage they reached orgasm nine times out of ten or better. Such unusual response coupled with the typical tendency of the aggressors to misjudge their female sexual partners makes us feel that these reported data are biased.
Obviously this allegedly good sexual adjustment did not counterbalance the maladjustments that plagued the marriages of the aggressors vs. minors. In fact, these offenders reported the fewest happy marriages of any group. About a fourth (the next to fewest) of their years of marriage had been very happy, whereas 41 per cent (the largest proportion recorded) were very unhappy.
In accord with their attitudes about coitus, some 79 per cent of the aggressors vs. minors had extramarital coitus (the third highest percentage), which is far above the 47 per cent of the control group. These men with such coitus had it with a greater number of partners (12) than the men of any other group.
There were too few separated, widowed, and divorced individuals to permit calculation of postmarital statistics.
*94\161\2*
Related Posts:
Tags: Erectile Dysfunction, Men’s Health
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.